P&P bond

Secrets of Bonding #164: The Phantom of the Underwriting Department

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

When it comes to surety bonds, you know your underwriter. You know the process.  There are questions and answers, then a decision.  Simple, right?

You rely on your rapport with the surety and know how to monitor the status of the underwriting.  Maybe you understand the underwriter you see.  But what about the invisible surety underwriter, a shadowy phantom who exists in every transaction, and whose opinion always affects the outcome. Call this mysterious one “The Phantom of the Underwriting Department.” 

For mood music, Click!

You cannot talk to the Phantom…  Invisible.

There are no emails, no Q. and A. 

And yet, the Phantom analyzes, reviews and influences every bonding decision.  Let’s pull back the curtain on this ethereal being.

Contractors Questionnaire

It all starts here.  Your underwriter looks at the basic info: How long in business?  Largest prior jobs? What do they do, what do they sub?

But the phantom yearns for more. What company ownership structure was chosen?  Is it a proprietorship, corporation or LLC?  Did the founders make prudent decisions? These choices affect taxes, profits and future liabilities.  They can help or hurt the company… and its surety.

If criminal history, litigation, tax problems or surety bond claims / losses are indicated, these may require further investigation.  The Phantom will make a deeper review.

Continuity of Ownership: Who succeeds the current stockholder in the event of death? Will the company maintain operations and complete its projects? These arrangements show that management has an eye toward the future.

The Work In Process Schedule

These are requested often.  They show the contracts in progress, their billing status and costs. The underwriter wants to know how much “work on hand.” Then, silently, the Phantom digs deeper.

The current expected profit is compared to the original estimate. What does this show? Is the profit expectation as predicted or better? Is the estimating department in sync with the field organization?  Is job site supervision highly efficient? Can an undeclared underbilling asset be added to Working Capital?

Is the expected profit sufficient to produce a net profit at year end?  The Phantom will compare the projected job profit percentage to the company Profit and Loss Statement. Based on historical expense trends, the likelihood of an upcoming profitable fiscal year-end can be verified.

Company Financial Statements

He loves these.  There is so much.  They talk to him. The Phantom takes full advantage of this document to determine more than just “the numbers.”

Beginning with the accountants cover letter, who has the contractor chosen for this important assignment? Are they using a construction expert? Did they pay for a quality presentation?  Is the best accounting method in use? Is the fiscal date at an advantageous point in their business cycle?

Obviously, underwriters look at working capital, net worth, ratios, profitability. But there is so much more.  The financial statements show how the stockholders / managers treat the company.  What does it mean to them? Do they nurture and respect it, growing the tiny acorn into a mighty oak?

Past borrowing practices are revealed.  Also, the relationship between financial performance and the ambitions of management.

Growth of the revenue stream is observed and management’s success in monitoring / controlling expense levels.

The Phantom reviews financial statements and tax returns to appreciate the owner’s commitment to the bonded company.  This commitment is a cornerstone of the underwriter’s confidence.

Banking Relations

Very important! There are similarities between banking and surety bonds.  The banker’s opinions help reaffirm the underwriting position.

The banking history can reveal good cash flow and prudent business practices.  It can indicate stability, reliability and good management skills.

Credit Reports

The pay record is just the tip of the iceberg.

Now there is a historical review which indicates the adequacy of cash flow, the quality of money management, planning and the applicant’s good moral character.

The Phantom is always there, making this deeper analysis that may never be discussed, but can always make a difference.

Meet Our Phantom

Now, Remove the Mask!

Sorry, we don’t actually have any Phantoms.  All our underwriters are regular people, with real experience and know-how when it comes to bid and performance bonds. Our surety professionals review the facts promptly and efficiently. 

Their deep analysis enables us to support opportunities that may have been declined elsewhere.

We hope you found this article entertaining, but more importantly, informative!  With us, the underwriting is deep and detailed, giving the applicant the highest likelihood of approval.

Call us with your next bid or performance bond, and speak to a real person. 856-304-7348 

(Don’t miss our next exciting article.  Click the “Follow” button at the top right.)

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one, Bid and Performance bonds, too.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Our Surety Agents Look Good

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

* Tuesday 6/19/18: We received an urgent submission.  A new client needed a $1 million final bond. We reviewed the file immediately and sent back our “road map to success.”

Complicating factors:

  • New file.  Short fuse.  All the basic analysis, credit reports, financial evaluation, indemnity agreement, etc. were needed.
  • Another surety had issued a bid bond, but because of unexpected developments, was unable to provide the final bond
  • There was a bid spread
  • The job specifications needed clarification regarding the surety obligation and possible requirement for a maintenance bond
  • Company year-end FS was a draft
  • Analysis regarding the collection of FYE Receivables was needed
  • Two other sureties reviewed this opportunity, causing the clock to run down for the client

* Wednesday 6/20: Agent provided additional info.

* Thursday 6/21: An engineering evaluation of the project was completed, including the adequacy of price.  Wednesday evening and Thursday, the underwriting review was completed. Bond is approved!

*Friday 6/22: Bond is issued and in the hands of the agent and contractor.

Actual agent comment: “Thanks so much!  Great job!”

Making our agents look good.  That’s what we do.

We can help you solve your next contract surety need. Call 856-304-7348

Secrets of Bonding #160: Deep in the Weeds with Set Aside Letters

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

In this article we will peel back the onion on Set Aside Letters (SAL) issued by banks in connection with construction loans.  What are they, when they are useful for bonding companies and when are they not?

Here is the essence of such documents:

“The agreement covering the project will provide that the funds in said impound account are … to be disbursed for payment of the (Name of Project) mentioned above and only after (Bank) has satisfied itself that the work paid for has actually been performed… In the event (Borrower) fails to complete the project described herein… all funds remaining in said impound account shall be immediately available to Surety to complete and pay the costs of said project, and in such event, (Borrower) waives any claim or interest in the remaining funds. Surety shall not in any way be obligated to repay said funds so used to (Bank).

This is an irrevocable commitment of funds which is not subject to recall or offset by (Bank).”

Pretty interesting!  This letter / agreement keeps the loan in play to fund the completion of the project  – even if the borrower (bank customer) fails / defaults.

When Are Set Aside Letters Used?

These documents are a common underwriting tool when a Site or Subdivision Bond is issued by a surety. If the bond applicant (who is also the developer and borrower) is relying on a construction loan to fund the bonded work, the SAL protects the surety by providing funds for the completion of the work in the event of a default.

What a great idea.  So why don’t we use these on everything?  Let’s look at another example.

Commercial Projects

The project owner hires a bonded contractor and a bank loan will fund the project.  The bank needs a guarantee that the asset / project (which backs the loan) will be built as intended.  A Performance and Payment Bond accomplishes this and assures there will be no Mechanics Liens against the property for unpaid bills.  These two aspects benefit the project owner and the lender.  Keep in mind, in a borrower default situation, the bank becomes the new owner of the property.

It is common for the bank to stipulate that a bonded contractor be used, and they may want to be a named beneficiary on the P&P bond – accomplished by issuing a Dual Obligee Rider.  In turn, should the underwriter require a SAL from the lender?

On Commercial projects, the normal practice is to NOT obtain a SAL from the lender.  Why not?  Why is this different?

Choose one:

a. The bank is a secured lender

b. The bank can subrogate against the borrower’s assets

c. The Dual Obligee Rider serves a purpose similar to the SAL

a. and b. are true, but the answer is c.

Welcome to the Weeds

We’re going in now. The Dual Obligee Rider adds the lender as a beneficiary with all the rights and obligations of the obligee named on the bond (the project owner).  And what are they?  Obviously they are entitled to make a performance claim and have the project delivered as indicated in the contract.

The named obligee also has obligations, one of the most primary is to PAY the builder. Important: The obligee is prohibited from making a performance claim if they have failed to pay the contractor.

Therefore, when the bank is included under a Dual Obligee Rider, they accept the benefits and obligations.  If the borrower defaults, the lender cannot make a bond claim unless they continue to pay the construction loan to the surety.  (Now the bank owns the project and the surety has become the contractor.)

Summary

Is this starting to make sense?  When a borrower defaults on a commercial project, a lender included by Dual Obligee Rider cannot make a claim unless they continue to pay the project funds to the surety.

Deeper Weeds

On Site and Subdivision there is a unique risk – the lender can take a free ride on the surety by having the bonding company pay out of pocket to complete the project.

Site and Sub-D bonds have the local municipality as obligee, not the bank.  The bank doesn’t want a Dual Obligee Rider because they automatically receive a financial benefit if the municipality makes a bond claim to demand completion of the project.  If the borrower has defaulted, the bank has the opportunity to withhold the balance of the loan (the borrower is gone), and watch the surety pay to complete a project they now own.  And they were not even the bond claimant…

This is the risk sureties avoid on Site and Subdivision Bonds by requiring the SAL that keeps the loan in play, even if the bond applicant / borrower has failed.

Admittedly, this is a pretty obscure subject, but also interesting to us “bond nerds.”  It never hurts to understand how things fit together.  These skills help us solve your complicated bond opportunities.  Take advantage of our expertise when the next one pops up.

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision, Bid and Performance Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

(Don’t miss our next exciting article.  Click the “Follow” button at the top right.)

Secrets of Bonding #159: Beware the False Asker

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

Surety Bond Producers have one main goal: produce the business and move on.

You know there is a process when submitting a surety bond for approval but hate that sick feeling when the underwriter comes back with a ton of questions.  Let’s face it, customers just want to complete the transaction and get on with their lives.  They have more important things to do than fill out forms, scan documents and complete applications.  You know you’ll get push back if you bug them.  

What’s more, the questions may result in a dead end, a declination!  Did the underwriter already form an opinion?  Did they already decide the account is not for them, but just want to complete the file… to have a complete file?

We will call such a person the “False Asker” – an underwriter who puts you through the paces, just to say no at the end.  They never really wanted to write the bond and are developing the file under false pretenses.  They send you on a fools mission.  It is 100% a waste of your time!

Or just maybe, questions are the opposite…  The bond underwriter thinks the account may be a fit, but just needs to check a few more points.  This could be the first step on a successful journey. Here’s more: There may be something wonderful about the questions good underwriters ask.  Let’s explore.

When reviewing the file, the analyst marks off elements of strength and weakness.  For example, the company is 10 years old, but current management has only been in place for a year (a plus and a minus).  Or maybe the net worth is strong, but debt is high resulting in too much leverage.  If there is more good than bad, an approval may be in order – after additional development. 

Now comes the gift: The key points, the underwriting questions, are an insight to the decision making process.  They are keys to the underwriter’s mind.  With favorable answers, authorization may ensue. The questions chart a course that the producer could imagine but not confirm.  In this manner, the underwriting questions are priceless, the keys to success.

Remember, there is room for frustration on the underwriter’s side, too.

Q. Which of the underwriting questions are optional? You know, the unimportant ones?

A. They are all important.

Sometimes we ask 5 Q’s and get back 3 A’s.  Then re-ask the 3 and get back only 2.  It’s like beating your head against the wall…

It all comes down to this:  Beware the False Asker.  You must avoid that person who churns the file and wastes your time.  Every producer has been through it.  You answer questions for two weeks and get a declination they could have figured on day one – and not wasted your time.

A good underwriter only develops an account they intend to support.  They like it and want to proceed, but must tidy up the file. Their Qs are a gift, the path forward, the key to your success if you follow through willingly and diligently.

Judge all of us by our performance:

  • Good underwriters are prompt. For example, our office provides a same day response on all submissions.
  • Are our responses concise and easy to understand?
  • Do we offer a prompt declination or clear path forward, defined by the underwriting questions that will get the deal done?

A good surety underwriter can be your important ally and business partner.  Choose us carefully based on performance, and always Beware the False Asker!

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision, Bid and Performance Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

(Don’t miss our next exciting article.  Click the “Follow” button at the top right.)

SECRETS OF BONDING #157: Bid Bond Quiz

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

Is there anything less interesting than a bid bond?

They may not seem too exciting, but the lowly bid bond is an integral part of our surety business.  For contractors, they are often the key to acquiring new revenues.  If you don’t think they are important, watch what happens when a client is waiting for one that never arrives.

As surety underwriters, we spend a great deal of effort assuring these documents are accurate, delivered on time, and we track the outcome on each one.

Everybody knows about bid bonds, right?!  OK let’s see if you do…

True or False:

  1. If you decide to not use a bid bond you ordered, you have to send it back to the surety within 48 hours
  2. They have an expiration date
  3. A bid bond precedes every performance bond
  4. The surety can cancel the bid bond
  5. The dollar value of the bid bond equals the amount of the proposal it accompanies
  6. The surety must know the exact dollar value of the bid bond before they will issue it
  7. The premium for them must be paid in advance
  8. They remain active for up to six months
  9. It is better to use a check for security than a bid bond
  10. The same surety that issues the bid bond must issue the performance bond

OK team, how’d you do?  # of True______? # of False____?

They are all False!

  1. An unused bid bond has no value but it makes a great liner for your bird cage
  2. Never has an expiration date
  3. Some contracts are negotiated (no bid bond) or may require a surety capacity letter instead
  4. Like a performance bond, these surety instruments cannot be cancelled
  5. Most often the penal sum of the bid bond equals a percentage (10-20%) of the proposal amount
  6. Most bid bond amounts are expressed as a percentage of the proposal amount, not a dollar amount, to protect the confidentiality of the proposers bid. In such cases the exact dollar value is unknown in advance.
  7. Sureties are entitled to charge for them, but usually don’t
  8. Although not stated, most sureties consider them void after 90 days
  9. Wrong! If the performance bond is not produced, the check can be forfeited
  10. Nope! Two different sureties can be used, even if a “Consent of Surety” was issued with the bid bond.

Bonus Question: If the bid is rejected because the surety’s credentials are found to be inadequate, can this result in a bid bond claim?

Answer: Theoretically, it should not. If the bond is declared inadequate, how can it be sufficient for a claim?

When flexibility and aggressive underwriting are needed, give us a call.  Find out what you missing when it comes to surety bonds.  

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision, Bid and Performance Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

(Don’t miss our next exciting article.  Click the “Follow” button at the top right.)

Secrets of Bonding #156: You Know About Financial Statements

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

Audit, Review, Compilation: You know the difference. With bonding companies, you need certain financial statements (FSs) at different times. But there is one FS you don’t know about, and it can be very helpful!

  • Audit: This is the highest level of CPA (Certified Public Accountant) presentation. The CPA provides a cover letter stating they have checked over the numbers and believe they are accurate.
  • Review: This is the middle level.  The CPA does some checking, but less than an audit.
  • Compilation: This report has a disclaimer letter.  It says the FS is the presentation of management – meaning the CPA does not vouch for the numbers.
  • Other than CPA prepared statements, you could run into one by a PA (Public Accountant,) or a bookkeeper.
  • There are also Internally Prepared statements produced directly by the customer, such as with Quickbooks.

Then there is this Secret One you probably don’t know about.  It can be a strategic help and will not be suggested by the accountant.  It’s up to you to get it!  We call it a “Confirmed Internal FS.”  

This document is an internal FS, such as Quickbooks, but with an important upgrade.  When obtaining a Confirmed Internal Report, the president or company owner is required to sign and date the company Balance Sheet (or maybe every page of the document) and write “Confirmed.”  This is an affirmative statement that the FS has been scrutinized.  It is a document with greater credibility, because someone is taking responsibility for it. (Read Secret #5 about the role confidence plays in bonding.)

Here is a real life example of how beneficial, how strategic, the Confirmed Internal FS can be.  This week we are issuing an $8 million P&P bond for an applicant with a 12/31 fiscal year-end. Obviously, the CPA report is not available yet (less than one month after the FYE). However, before issuing the bond, we must get a read on their financial picture.  How did the year turn out?

We can’t get the CPA report, but an internal FS is available.  These documents come off the client’s computer system. If the company doesn’t have an in-house accountant (many do not), the FS has low credibility unless it is reviewed and Confirmed by a responsible party / indemnitor.

Can underwriters base a decision on a Confirmed FS? That depends on whether the surety has the flexibility to give an approval in the absence of a CPA Audit or Review (many do not.)

Fortunately, we were able to proceed based on the confidence that the business owner reviewed and Confirmed the financial statement.  He signed his name and went on record, “You can rely on these numbers.” To us, that makes a big difference!

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision, Bid and Performance Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Secrets of Bonding #155: The Double Bonding Conundrum

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

This is America. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Like on the subject of Double Bonding (Contract Surety) we will not all agree.

So here are the facts. You will decide if this is a great idea or just a waste.

What is Double Bonding?

Also called “back bonding” or “subcontract bonding” an example would be when both a subcontract and a prime (directly with the project owner) construction contract are bonded. The prime contractor is the General Contractor (GC).

The GC gives some of the work to trade contractors such as the plumbing, electrical and HVAC. These firms may be required to give a subcontract bond to the GC guaranteeing their work. In turn, the GC provides a bond that covers everything. In other words, it too covers the plumbing, electrical and HVAC. That’s the “double” part. Sounds pretty dopey so far, right? Why would anybody do that?

Turns out this occurs often. Depending on your viewpoint, it may seem helpful / essential, or just a waste of money. Let’s evaluate it and you decide.

Why Love It:

  • Owner: Subs that have been approved by a surety may perform better.
  • GCs: May have a policy to automatically bond subs over a certain dollar value. This is intended to prevent delays and unpaid bill problems.  In addition, the GC / prime contractor is the direct beneficiary, and the potential claimant against such bonds.
  • Subcontractors: With a surety backing them, they may have an advantage when pursuing new work. These are important credentials that prove they have passed the underwriters scrutiny and have the backing of a professional guarantor.
  • Sureties:  May find it easier to support the GC bond if major subs are bonded. A portion of the risk is then covered by *another bonding company.
  • Third tier subs and material suppliers: May not be protected by a payment bond unless double bonding is in place. The GC’s bond may not go down to the third tier (sub of a sub or third tier suppliers.)
  • The most important reason: It is possible that the GC’s surety may insist that major subs be bonded as a condition of supporting the GC. This can be the key to acquiring the contract.

Why Hate It:

  • Owner: Doesn’t need sub bonds because the GC’s bond already covers all the work.  They may be forced to bear the related premium costs if the sub bonds were anticipated. If they were not, the charges may come out of the GC’s profits.
  • GC: In a competitive situation, the related costs could cause them to lose the project. Sub bonds may help GC with their surety, but they do not reduce the cost or dollar value of the GC’s bond.

Bonus Conundrum

Love it or hate it, double bonding is sometimes done voluntarily, or it may be stipulated by the GC’s surety. There is no denying that the concept is important – so important that in some cases both the GC bond and the sub bonds are written by the *same surety. Why would they do that?!

~ ~ ~

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision, Bid and Performance Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

(Don’t miss our next exciting article.  Click the “Follow” button at the top right.)

* This procedure adds more premium and more assets / indemnity to the project, however it does not lay off any risk.

Secrets of Bonding #119: Lien On Me

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

“It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble.  It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.”  A famous quote by…?

Let’s go over what you need to know about construction liens.  They can have a big impact on construction contracts and companies.            Click for mood music!

A Mechanic’s Lien is filed when a subcontractor or supplier on a construction project fails to be paid. The lien is a form of claim filed against the project itself. For example, the unpaid mason (subcontractor) files a claim against the building owner. “My bricks and labor are in that façade. I can’t take them back now, but assert that the general contractor has failed to pay me!”

Liens are used on non-governmental projects. Typically, claimants are prohibited from liening a public building – which is where Payment Bonds come in. Issued by surety companies, the payment bond is a resource to protect suppliers of labor and material from non-payment.

So far that’s all pretty straight forward. On private contracts unpaid subs and suppliers can file a lien. On government jobs they make a claim on the payment bond instead.

Here are some implications worth knowing.

Release of Lien

The lien can be released, or “bonded off,” by the filing of a (you guessed it) Release of Lien Bond. This removes the lien from the property in question, which is beneficial for the project owner, while still providing financial protection for the plaintiff (unpaid sub or supplier.) The dispute is still unresolved, but the plaintiffs security shifts from the physical project to the surety bond.

A release of lien bond is not easy to obtain. But if a payment bond was issued, that surety has motivation to prevent a payment bond claim, and issuing the lien release bond could do so.

When the lien release bond is filed, it takes some pressure off the defendant (general contractor). You can assume the unpaid mason hopes the lien will cause the owner (who is the recipient of the lien) to force the GC to respond. When the lien is bonded off, that effect disappears from the project owner – but not the surety.

Stop Notices

California, Mississippi, Arizona, Alaska and Washington use a slightly different procedure. On governmental projects a Stop Notice is filed which freezes a portion of the project funds to protect the claimant. This forces action on the part of the GC, or they can file a Release of Stop Notice bond to keep the project funds flowing while dealing with the dispute.

Understand the Difference

Mechanic’s Liens are filed against the project owner.  The claim attaches to the real property and is recorded against the property title – which therefore restricts the owner’s ability to dispose of the property.  

With a lien, the claimant may be paid regardless of whether the owner paid the GC.  In fact, the owner may have to pay twice: First to the GC then again to the sub / vendor claimant, to remove the lien and clear the property title.

Stop Notices “trap” contract funds, assuming there are funds to trap.

If the claimant files a Stop Notice after the funds have been disbursed, it is useless. 

Other basic differences:

  • Unlike a lien, the stop notice does not give the debt any security.
  • The stop notice is sent to the relevant parties, but it is not legally recorded such as a lien filed against the property title.  The claim is inherently less official and is sometimes even ignored because of it’s less formal appearance.
  • Unlike a Mechanics Lien, the Stop Notice can affect the entire project because it freezes a portion of the contract funds – which the GC may need in order to continue working.

NOTICE: The author is not an attorney and is not giving legal advice.  This article is for entertainment only.  Gimme a break!

mark-twain

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision and Contract Surety Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Secrets of Bonding #62: ILOC: What is it? What isn’t it?

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

Sample #1

IRREVOCABLE LETTER-OF-CREDIT
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Motor Carrier Services – IRP Unit
P.O. Box 7955
Madison, WI 53707-7955

We hereby establish our irrevocable letter of credit in your favor for ACCOUNT NAME, in an amount not to exceed $00.00.
All checks written by ACCOUNT NAME payable to Registration Fee Trust, (Wisconsin Department of Transportation) for the remaining registration fees will be honored by BANK NAME up to the irrevocable credit limit.

If ACCOUNT NAME fails to make payments to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation when due, the BANK NAME will allow the Department of Transportation to draw on the Irrevocable Letter of Credit up to the credit limit, provided the BANK NAME receives written documentation from the Wisconsin Department of Transportation stating registration fees have not been paid when due.

This IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT expires: _______, ______, ______

Sample #2

CITY OF FREDERICK
IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT
Date of Issue: _____ Date of Expiry: _____ Issue Number: __________

Beneficiary:
The City of Frederick
c/o DPW Projects Division
Attention Linda Dutrow
111 Airport Drive East
Frederick, Maryland 21701

Gentlemen,
We hereby authorize you to draw on us for account of (name)____________ at (address) ______, up to an aggregate amount of $ _____ (_____) dollars and _ cents) US Dollars, available by your drafts at sight accompanied by a signed statement that the funds are being drawn and required for payment in accordance with an executed Public Works Agreement between the City of Frederick and the party named in this paragraph for (project description) _________________.

Drafts must be drawn and negotiated not later than ______ at our counters. Partial drawings are permitted.

Each draft must state that it is drawn under the Irrevocable Letter of Credit of (name of issuing bank) _____________ Number _____________ dated _______. This Letter of Credit is not transferable or assignable without written consent of (name of issuing bank) ___________________________.

This credit is subject to the “Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits” (1994, or latest revision) International Chamber of Commerce, Brochure Number 500.

It is a condition of this Letter of Credit that it shall be deemed automatically extended without amendment for one (1) year from the present or any future expiration date of this Letter of Credit unless at least forty-five (45) days prior to such expiration date we notify you by certified mail that we elect not to consider this Letter of Credit renewed for such additional period.

We hereby agree that all drafts drawn under and within the terms and amount of this credit and accompanied by the documents above specified, that such drafts will be duly honored upon presentation to the drawee.

These are two examples of ILOCs. Let’s find out about these, and why they look so different.

“ILOC” stands for Irrevocable Letter or Credit. They may also be called a Standby Letter of Credit. These instruments are only issued by Commercial Banks. The purpose is to enable one party to draw on the account of another in connection with a business transaction. If the beneficiary makes a draft (draw) upon the ILOC, the bank records it as a loan to the account holder who is the subject of the letter (the contractor in a construction scenario). The beneficiary is not required to repay the bank.

A perfect example is the overseas practice to use an ILOC in the same manner we normally use a Performance and Payment Bond in support of a contract. The contract owner is entitled to draw on the ILOC in the event of the principal’s default.

The two examples above are actual suggested formats from those beneficiaries. The Wisconsin DOT is unusual because of its brevity. The City of Fredrick form is more typical of what you may see, particularly if using an ILOC to give collateral to a surety.

What are the important elements missing in the DOT form?

If the duration of the related business transaction is longer than the term of the ILOC, the beneficiary normally demands an “evergreen clause” which provides for automatic renewal. It means if no action is taken prior to anniversary, the instrument does not expire. This gives the beneficiary confidence that they will be formally notified prior to anniversary that the bank intends to non-renew, and they will have sufficient time to draw down (cash out) the entire ILOC so they remain protected.

It is also normal for the instrument to allow partial draws, and require the return of drawn funds that are ultimately unused.

It is important for the document to correctly state the party whose actions are the subject of the guarantee (the principal) and the circumstances under which a draw can be made should be standard.

Beneficiaries of these instruments must scrutinize the financial condition of the issuing bank. In cases where the FDIC rescues a banking institution, they have the ability to unilaterally nullify these instruments to aide in the bank rehabilitation. For bonding companies, this means they can lose their collateral even though they remain “irrevocably” obligated on the P&P bond. Check the bank strength here: http://www.fitchratings.com

Summary
We have covered what an ILOC is, the key aspects and what to look for.

What isn’t it?

For Obligees (the beneficiary of the bond) it may not be a good alternative to a Performance and Payment bond.

1. The bank does not pre-qualify the contractor’s ability to perform the work the way a surety does.
2. In the event of default, the project owner (obligee) must assess the contract status, arrange for a completion contractor and manage the process to a successful conclusion. With a bond, the surety may do all this.
3. An ILOC does not prevent liens against the project or provide the process to resolve them.

Owners may accept an Irrevocable Letter of Credit as an alternative to a surety bond. However, the fact remains that an ILOC does not match the comprehensive protection of a Performance and Payment Bond.

What about for Contractors and Developers?

  1. Bonds are not easy to get.  The contractor must pass a rigorous evaluation by the surety.  Bonded contractors and developers can promote the fact that they have the support of a surety: Bragging Rights!  Many include this info in their brochure along with their banking credentials.
  2. Having cash tied up for indeterminate time periods can put a strain on construction companies.  They need it to finance the start of new contracts and solve problems on existing ones.  Developers may lose out on opportunities to acquire new projects or property.  Reminder: Projects may be completed / released later than expected, meaning the cash remains tied up for how long?

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision, Bid and Performance Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it! Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Don’t want to miss our next exciting article?  Click the “Follow” link in the upper right corner.

Secrets of Bonding #45: Backpedaling and How to Avoid It

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

Sureties commonly rely on a variety of elements when deciding if they will provide surety bonds for contractors. All relevant underwriting factors are considered, including the applicant’s financial condition.

In most bonding scenarios, the applicant for the bonds is a construction company – typically a corporation or LLC. An important element of the financial evaluation is the company’s financial statement.

Why so much emphasis on this one document? The financial statement is considered a report card on the quality of management. It shows a range of important indicators. To name a few:

  1. How strong a financial commitment the owners made to the company (capitalization)
  2. The amount of revenues management has acquired in the previous operating cycle
  3. The extent to which construction contracts were realistically estimated and successfully managed
  4. Management of overhead expenses
  5. Tax planning
  6. Adequacy of cash flow
  7. Liquidity
  8. Profitability
  9. Reliance on banks and other creditors to finance operations
  10. Collectability of receivables

The analyst’s favorite financial statement date is the company’s fiscal year-end (FYE), which is “tax day.” We prefer this date for two reasons.

  • Underwriters need to make a periodic review to monitor the applicant’s financial status, so an annual review on the FYE is perfect.
  • The tax day numbers will be realistic and conservatively presented – to minimize the tax exposure. This conservative approach is ideal for the bond underwriters who hope to make a realistic analysis of the applicant.  For most companies tax day is December 31st.

So where does the backpedaling come in?

Company managers rely on their Certified Public Accountant for financial advice, especially tax planning. Limiting taxes is a popular goal, but at what price? Lower taxes may be the result of lower pre-tax profits. Lower profits mean less financial growth and possibly an inadequate net worth. (See Secret #3: Taxes) Why should stockholders continue to support a company that fails in its primary mission: Producing a profit?

Obviously these issues are a great concern to surety underwriters, who want successful, well-managed companies as clients. If tax avoidance is aggressively pursued, it is not unlikely that bonding capacity will be compromised. The surety may limit their support or even terminate the relationship if financial performance is weak.

Once the financial document is carved in stone, company management may face an entire year of backpedaling: “We showed poor results because…” until the next FYE report can show better numbers.

The problem is not uncommon, and the solution is simple if executed properly. Avoid backpedaling by having a draft financial statement initially produced by the CPA. The document will be marked “For Discussion Purposes” and discussion is exactly what’s needed. A review by the underwriter will determine if any elements of the report are detrimental for bonding purposes. Plans for the coming year can be discussed and bonding capacity evaluated.

If the financial statement does not support the desired amount of surety capacity, now is the time to make adjustments before the final version is produced. Backpedaling is avoided!

With some planning and open dialogue agents can help their contractors avoid the missteps that prevent companies from realizing their full bonding and financial potential.

  • Agents, 60 days prior to your client’s fiscal year-end is the time to act. Get the ball rolling!
  • Contractors, tell your accountant a draft fiscal year-end statement will be needed for discussion with the bonding company.

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision, Bid and Performance Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.  856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.