claims

Secrets of Bonding #53: Funds Control vs. Tripartite Agreements

You may have heard these terms used in connection with Performance and Payment Bonds.  The concepts are similar in some ways, but have different purposes.  Let’s talk about them and how they can help you as a surety bond producer.

Funds Control

Also called Funds Administration or Escrow, it is a procedure that always originates at the request of the surety.  The contractor applying for the bond (the Principal) is receiving a “conditional” approval.  The underwriters are confident there is sufficient expertise, labor, equipment, etc. to perform the bonded contract, but the contractor has some financial issues.  The underwriter is willing to bond the performance obligation, but has reservations regarding the handling of money and payment of bills (the Payment Bond exposure).  Funds Control can provide a level of protection for the surety by taking the money handling responsibilities away from the contractor.

Normal contract, the project owner (Obligee on the bond), is required to pay the contract funds to the Principal.  This is usually in monthly payments, each for the work recently performed.

With Funds Control, the money handling is taken away from the contractor and moved to a party chosen by the surety and empowered by the Principal.  The surety will require that the contractor execute a letter of instructions directing the obligee to pay the Funds Administrator instead of them.  The administrator becomes the paymaster on the project paying all suppliers of labor and material, and paying the principal, too.  This procedure eliminates most of the risk of claim on the Payment Bond.   (#Why not 100%?)

There are companies that are professional Fund Administrators.  They may be well known to the surety and handle a series of contracts with them.  A dedicated bank account is opened for the contract, and checks are issued each month which are then distributed by the principal to the vendors.  In some cases, the surety may perform the Funds Administration in house.

Tripartite Agreements

This arrangement also involves the contract funds being redirected to a third party, instead of being paid to the contractor.  And similar to Funds Administration, the point is for the Tripartite Administrator to be the paymaster on the contract.

The primary difference between the concepts is that there is no bond when a Tripartite Agreement is used – it is in lieu of a P&P bond and actually only replaces the Payment Bond.

  • Funds Control is required by the surety providing the P&P bond.
  • A Tripartite Agreement is stipulated by the obligee in lieu of bond.

Review federal regulations regarding Tripartite Agreements: A tripartite escrow agreementhttp://www.acquisition.gov/far/html/Subpart%2028_1.html

“The prime contractor establishes an escrow account in a federally insured financial institution and enters into a tripartite escrow agreement with the financial institution, as escrow agent, and all of the suppliers of labor and material. The escrow agreement shall establish the terms of payment under the contract and of resolution of disputes among the parties. The Government makes payments to the contractor’s escrow account, and the escrow agent distributes the payments in accordance with the agreement, or triggers the disputes resolution procedures if required.”

This procedure may be used for contracts between $30,000 and $150,000. The Performance Bond may be waived at the contracting officer’s discretion.

Conclusion

These procedures have different implications.  Let’s examine them.

FC= Funds Control

TA= Tripartite Agreement

The Obligee:

  • FC – They are getting Payment protection and a Performance Bond. The surety will monitor the project and step in to keep things on track (and prevent a claim or default) if necessary. In the event of failure, the surety completes the project.
  • TA – Even unbondable contractors can be awarded work. A TA may be less expensive than a bond with FC. Limitation: There may be no Performance guarantee.

The Principal:

  • Both processes result in the contractor successfully obtaining the project but with no handling the project funds.
  • TA – No need for personal or company indemnity.  No collateral for the surety. Financial reporting, legal fees and other expenses may be less.  Limitations: Federal only permits TA on small contracts.  Fails to build a track record of “performing under bond”

Subs and Suppliers:

  • Under both procedures they are paid by a professional intermediary, which may be more dependable and faster.
  • FC – They can make a claim against the Payment Bond
  • TA – Limitation: No opportunity to claim against a surety bond if they are unpaid, or not fully paid.  What is their recourse?

Agent and surety:

  • TA – No Bond!  (Beans for supper again?)
  • FC – A normal P&P Bond is issued

# If the principal fails to list any subs or suppliers during the set-up process, they will not be under the protection of the funds administrator.  However, they WILL still have the right to make a claim against the payment bond!

KIS Surety is the national contract bond underwriting department for Great Midwest Insurance Company, a national, corporate surety with an A-8 rating.  We throw all this underwriting talent at your bond opportunities and support contracts up to $10,000,000.

If you have a contract surety case that needs a fast, creative response, call us: 856-304-7348

(Don’t miss our next exciting article.  Click the “Follow” button at the top right.)

Secrets of Bonding #46: Turn IRON into GOLD

When contractors apply for Performance Bonds, the underwriting review always includes a financial analysis along with other elements.

Two key components of the financial analysis are Working Capital (WC) and Net Worth (NW).  WC is a measure of short term financial strength.  NW is the ultimate value of the company upon liquidation.

The inspiration for this article came from a new bond account we recently reviewed.  The company is a trade contractor, the kind that normally performs their own work rather than subcontracting. This means their financial statements should show appropriate levels of labor, plant, and equipment.

In this case, the Profit and Loss Statement (P&L) showed sales in excess of $10 million, not a small company. The Balance Sheet showed an acceptable amount of WC, but NW was low – resulting in some weak ratios.

Another element caught our attention: On the Balance Sheet, the net value of the equipment asset was only $65,000! This made us wonder how a company could perform $10 million in sales with so little in physical resources.

There could be a couple of explanations:

  1. They could be subcontracting most of their work.  This is unlikely, however, because they themselves are subcontractors. Typically there is not enough profit to share between two firms. A review of this company’s P&L statement did not indicate extensive subcontracting.
  2. They could be renting almost everything (instead of owning).  This doesn’t sound like a practical approach with sales as high as $10 million, and the P&L did not show high rental expenses.
  3. The equipment could be substantially depreciated resulting in a low net value on the Balance Sheet.  This did turn out to be the scenario in their case.

Let’s talk more about #3. But first off, what is depreciation?

IRS definition: http://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses-%26-Self-Employed/A-Brief-Overview-of-Depreciation

It says in part, “Depreciation is an income tax deduction that allows a taxpayer to recover the cost or other basis of certain property. It is an annual allowance for the wear and tear, deterioration, or obsolescence of the property.”

This means when a $100,000 backhoe is purchased, its value as an asset on the Balance Sheet goes down each year as the depreciation progresses.  Bear in mind, this is an accounting entry.  It is not an indication of the current market value of the asset.

Eventually, the asset is depreciated to zero. However, even if it is valueless on the Balance Sheet, it may still be out on a job site working and producing revenues.  It may still have a market value. So therein lies the Gold.

Assets such as heavy equipment (referred to as “Iron”), may have value that is not reflected on the Balance Sheet. So the question is: How to recapture that value and help the bond worthiness of the account?

One way is with a professional appraisal.  Even if the backhoe is depreciated to zero, if the current market value is $25,000, that represents NW that can be added to the financial ratios.

Imagine the effect for the company in question.  Upon further review, we determined that the cost of their equipment was nearly $2 million.  They had a lot of it and it was older so depreciation had reduced the net value on the Balance Sheet to $65,000.  However the current market value was actually $500,000!

Q. Based on these facts, what value should the bond underwriters use for the equipment:  $65,000, $2,000,000, $500,000 or some other amount?

A. If you’ve been following along, that’s where the appraised value comes in.  You need an independent determination of current market value that recognizes the amount of cash these assets could bring.  If well maintained, they have a value higher than that shown on the Balance Sheet. ($500,000)

How else can the value be determined?  The client could provide a copy of their equipment floater as evidence of current value.  You could also get an informal appraisal from their equipment dealer.  Any of these options are better that living with the unrealistically low value shown on the Balance Sheet.

Going back to our example, if the backhoe’s market value is currently $25,000, give that info to the underwriter.  The newly found net worth for all such assets can be added to the bonding analysis.  You turned the Iron into Gold, a POT of Gold!  It can totally transform the ratios and the client’s ability to qualify for the bonds they desire.

Consider this technique for companies with a sizable fleet of mature equipment, especially when their Net Worth is less than desired for bonding purposes.  This analysis can also help strengthen the banking relationship.


A special note from the author: Steve Golia

I am an Independent Broker and Surety Bond Specialist. If you wish to co-broker bond business, together we will deliver the best in bonding expertise for your clients.  I have a broad range of markets available and often can solve problems even when others have failed.

Call me now (856-304-7348) or email: Steven.Golia@gmail.com

 

Secrets of Bonding #43: Subcontractors and Subcontracts

“If you are a bonding company, why won’t you bond subcontractors?”

It might seem odd, but some Sureties do not embrace the opportunity to serve subcontractors.  So what’s different about subcontractors and subcontracts?  Why do some sureties red line this entire segment of the market?

The Food Chain

One complaint underwriters may have about subcontractors is that they are farther down the food chain than General Contractors. GCs have a “prime” contract, meaning they work directly for the project owner, and are the first recipient of monetary payments.  The subcontractors are subsequently paid by the GC.  Subs may face delays and sometimes even harassment at the hands of GCs. Remember, subcontracts are all private contracts not regulated by governmental rules even if the prime contract is public. Put simply, subs have a harder time collecting their money.

Other Issues for Subs and Their Sureties

  • GCs do not normally disclose bid results (2nd & 3rd  bidder’s figures).  This makes it difficult to evaluate contract price adequacy – a disadvantage for both the sub and surety.
  • Unregulated procurement procedures and contract administration – GCs may be aggressive in their procurement methods, pressuring subs for price concessions: “Knock their heads together.” Such practices make the subcontracts less profitable and therefore more risky for the sub and surety.  Subs can also be victimized with verbal awards and unwritten change orders.
  • Contract documents (including bond forms) may be non-standard, drafted by GCs specifically to give strong advantages over subs and sureties.  In some cases the normal Performance bond is transformed into a forfeiture type financial obligation.
  • Flow-down or pass-through clauses in subcontracts force subs to assume obligations rightfully belonging to the GC. An example would be wording that makes the sub responsible for the liquidated damage amount on the prime contract if they are found to have caused a delay on the subcontract.
  • “Pay when paid” language can result in delayed payment to the sub.  “Pay if paid” can result in the sub never being paid.
  • Unbonded public work is rare, but in such cases there is no Payment Bond at the GC level to protect the sub, and liens (filed against the project for failure to receive payment) may be prohibited.
  • Indemnification: Broad form indemnity clauses can make the sub financially responsible even if they are not at fault.
  • Delay damages: Subs may be barred from seeking financial recovery.
  • Lien waivers: When read literally, these documents may operate to waive and release claims for which the subcontractor has not yet been paid.
  • Termination for Convenience: This contract clause can enable the GC to terminate the contract and leave the sub with a series of unreimbursed expenses and lost profits.
  • Some trades perform their work late in the project, meaning the bond is carried for a lengthy period with no progress on the contract.
  • Certain trades can operate with minimal capitalization, so the field may be populated with lightly financed companies. Such competitors can drive down contract prices making it harder to bond their work.
  • Financial reporting may be less sophisticated than for GCs (CPA financial statements vs. bookkeeper or QuickBooks).
  • Due to their size and circumstances, subs may lack bank support, such as a working capital line.

Conclusion

Subcontractors literally perform the majority of all construction work.  They are the backbone of the construction industry and cannot be ignored by sureties.

When it comes to bonding, subcontractors need to demonstrate that they are well-managed companies that reflect the same attributes as a successful GC.

Secrets #5 and #15 contain important guidance to help agents get subcontractors approved.

Start by choosing a surety that is actively seeking to support subcontractor accounts without requiring collateral.


A special note from the author: Steve Golia

I am an Independent Broker and Surety Bond Specialist. If you wish to co-broker bond business, together we will deliver the best in bonding expertise for your clients.  I have a broad range of markets available and often can solve problems even when others have failed.

Call me now (856-304-7348) or email: Steven.Golia@gmail.com

 

Secrets of Bonding #42: My Bond Amount Can Beat Your Contract Amount

Q. What is the normal relationship between the contract and bond amounts?

A. Performance and Payment Bonds are normally issued for 100% of the initial contract amount.

 

Q. What do you call a bond that’s for less than the full contract amount?

A. Underwriters call these “percentage bonds,” such as a 50% Performance and Payment bond. Some obligees stipulate these in order to make the bond cheaper (doesn’t work), to help the contractor preserve their bond capacity (doesn’t), or to make the bond easier to obtain (nope). What it does do is deprive the obligee of part of the protection they are buying.

 

Q. What happens with the original 100% bond amount if there is a subsequent amendment increasing the contract price?

A. The bond is often required to automatically follow an increase in the contract amount, without “notice to or consent of” the surety.

 

Q. Is there a limit to how much the bond can be automatically increased?

A. A limitation may be stipulated in the bond to protect the surety from huge unanticipated increases, such as no more than a 10% increase without the written agreement of the surety.

 

Q. What is the basis of the calculation for the bond cost?

A. The cost of the bond is normally based on the amount of the contract being guaranteed, not the bond.  If the bond is for 75% of the contract amount, the bond cost would be unchanged. Why does this make sense?

  1. The surety’s decision making process is still based on the entire scope of the contract including all technical aspects and the difficulty of performance. The underwriting expenses are unchanged.
  2. Which 75% of the contract does the bond cover? It covers the entire contract, but subject to a lesser maximum bond penalty. You could say it covers the bad 75% where the claim lies.  Full penalty bond losses are extremely rare, so the reduction to 75% has little benefit for the surety.

 

Q. What is the cost difference for Performance only, no Payment bond?

A. Since the underwriting is unchanged, there is no cost reduction.

 

The Maximum Rule:

Does your brain hurt yet?  It will after this.

The purpose of the Maximum Rule is to limit how much is charged (the maximum) for a “percentage” bond.  Suppose you have a 10% P&P bond on a $1 million contract with a straight rate of $25 / thousand.  Based on the contract amount, the bond fee would be $25,000.  Will the obligee pay $25,000 for a $100,000 bond?  Even though the bond will cover the entire $1 million of work, it’s a hard sell.  This is where the Maximum Rule comes in.

The price calculation under the Maximum rule is different.  Here is a typical example:

If the rate used in the Maximum Rule is $50 / thousand for the aggregate of the Performance ($100,000) plus Payment bond ($100,000) amounts, it will equal $50 x 200 or $10,000.  So in this example the maximum applicable charge would be $10,000 for the $100,000 bond, in recognition of the greatly reduced bond penalty.

With the Maximum Rule, you charge the normal price or use the Max Rule price – whichever is less.  As the percentage of the bond amount increases, the advantage of using the Maximum Rule disappears.  In this example the tipping point is 25%.  The Performance and Payment bond amount must be less than 25% of the contract amount for the Max Rule to result in a reduced charge.

Conclusion

Here’s the good news.  The vast majority of contracts stipulate a P&P bond equal to 100% of the contract amount; this is the typical statutory requirement on public work.  The same routine is normally followed on private contracts as well because it is the best way to protect the obligee’s interests.


A special note from the author: Steve Golia

I am an Independent Broker and Surety Bond Specialist. If you wish to co-broker bond business, together we will deliver the best in bonding expertise for your clients.  I have a broad range of markets available and often can solve problems even when others have failed.

Call me now (856-304-7348) or email: Steven.Golia@gmail.com

 

Secrets of Bonding #39: Design/Build vs. Design/Bid/Build

As surety brokers, we are watchful for “Design/Build” contracts.  If you feel like D/B projects are becoming more common, you’re correct!  The concept emerged in the 1980s and was formally codified by the federal government in 1996 after two years of collaboration with the private sector. The Clinger-Cohen Act established a two-step procurement process for such work.

Some sureties balk at the additional risk their clients assume on these projects. Put simply, the contractor becomes responsible for both design and construction.  In the event of a performance problem, this really cuts down on the finger pointing!

Bear in mind, it is the contractor (not the designer) who obtains the surety bond.  On “contractor-led” D/B projects, the contractor hires a licensed and insured architect to perform the design work. Another option is to form a joint venture between the architect and contractor.  In either case, a certain tension exists between these “partners” who have slightly different agendas, and this has implications for the surety – the guarantor of the project.

There is no denying we face unique risks on D/B contracts.  Let’s review them.

  • The designer must agree that their design (and subsequent revisions) will conform to the project budget “as bid.”  Without this, the contractor could be forced to absorb the cost of design changes.  Unprofitable contracts are more likely to go into default.
  • Similarly, designers must agree to conform to the project schedule. They cannot make changes that require construction timelines unsupported by the contract. Such changes could force the contractor to choose between significant unreimbursed expenses or failure to complete on time.
  • The design work must also conform to the project owner’s specifications at all times.

Design/Build contracts require some extra care, but can be bonded successfully.  Underwriters need to have the proper procedures and expertise to make these evaluations.

The alternative: Design/Bid/Build

You may encounter contracts specifically called Design/Bid/Build. So is this another new thing we have to learn?!

No, actually D/B/B this is the traditional construction method where the project owner hires and directs the architect. It is nothing new but may be named as such to identify the project as not Design/Build.

We may not have known it by name, but we have been helping contractors bond Design/Bid/Build for years!


A special note from the author: Steve Golia

I am an Independent Broker and Surety Bond Specialist. If you wish to co-broker bond business, together we will deliver the best in bonding expertise for your clients.  I have a broad range of markets available and often can solve problems even when others have failed.

Call me now (856-304-7348) or email: Steven.Golia@gmail.com

 

Secrets of Bonding #38: Capacity – How to Preserve It

For contractors, Bonding Capacity is a good as gold.  It enables the company to pursue new projects with the confidence that their surety will back the contracts when the need arises.  This is the source of increased revenues and greater profits!

How is available bonding capacity calculated? First a bonding line is determined, consisting of an Aggregate (total) amount and a Single per job limit.  The Aggregate is then decreased by different factors that consume the line. What can be done to minimize this effect so bonds remain available for the client? Let’s look at how the numbers are developed and how they can be appropriately managed.

Bonded and unbonded work is included in the analysis.  (*Why is Unbonded work included?)  Here’s the math:

Aggregate Capacity amount  Minus:

  1. Undecided bids (full contract amount)
  2. Low but unawarded bids (full contract amount)
  3. Projects that are awarded, signed or started (full contract amount)
  4. Remaining Costs to Complete on open contracts

Equals the Available Bonding Capacity.

So how can agents help their contractors preserve this vital asset?

1.  Prompt reporting of bid results – When bid bonds are issued, the entire estimated contract amount is deducted from available capacity, not the bid bond amount.  The capacity is not restored until the “not low” results reach the underwriter.

2.  Updated Work In Process (WIP) schedule:

  • Surety underwriters and accountants determine a contractor’s “current work load” based on the costs they must incur (such as labor and materials) to complete their open contracts.  When there are no remaining costs to incur on a project, by definition, it is considered completed.  The WIP schedule shows revised Costs Incurred to Date and Estimated Costs to Complete. Both increased costs incurred and decreased future costs improve available capacity.  Future costs may be reduced by progress on the contracts and also by greater labor efficiency, material cost savings, improved scheduling and other factors.
  • A reduction in the contract amount (by amendment) has the same effect because it reduces unincurred costs. Report such amendments immediately.

3.  Prompt reporting of completed or terminated work, including unbonded projects, removes them from the work load and therefore increases availability.

Note: Factors that can reduce available capacity include unincurred contract costs that increase for any reason and the addition of new unbonded projects.

*The aggregate capacity amount is based on all the contractor’s professional and financial capabilities. If unbonded projects are acquired, they consume resources (supervisory staff, equipment, etc.) and therefore must be recognized within the use of the bond line.

Available Bonding Capacity is a moving target subject to frequent revision.  To maximize availability, send us the right info and keep it current.


A special note from the author: Steve Golia

I am an Independent Broker and Surety Bond Specialist. If you wish to co-broker bond business, together we will deliver the best in bonding expertise for your clients.  I have a broad range of markets available and often can solve problems even when others have failed.

Call me now (856-304-7348) or email: Steven.Golia@gmail.com

 

Secrets of Bonding #37: Counting Counts!

One for you, one for me.

Two for you; one, two for me.

Three for you; one, two, three for me!

What fun, unless you are a surety underwriter and you’re incorrectly evaluating a financial picture.

When we review a new applicant for bonding, a range of factors are considered and the financial aspect is always one of them.  Sureties want to be confident that the company is stable and will be able to perform the bonded contract.  This includes the financial capability to finance the start of the work and deal with any issues that arise.  Such problems, if left unresolved, are the things bond claims are made of.

Who is the typical applicant for performance bonds?  Most often it is a privately owned company.  The focus of the financial evaluation is the fiscal year-end (FYE) of the company, which frequently is December 31st.

A range of elements are reviewed to determine the health of the company and its ability to survive the issues that often arise on construction projects.  One element is Cash.  Always the first (most liquid) asset listed on the Balance Sheet, you’ve heard the expressions: Cash is king, Cold hard cash, A cash cow!  A strong cash position is universally recognized as a sign of health.

As part of the primary financial evaluation, underwriters calculate the company’s FYE cash position.  Secondarily, the finances and cash position of the company owners will be reviewed.  These parties are indemnitors to the surety even though they are not direct bond applicants (bond “Principals”).  In the event of loss, the surety is entitled to look to these parties for salvage and subrogation (financial recovery) – so the financial strength they add to the picture is relevant.

Trick Question: If financial statements show that the company has $100,000 cash at the 12/31 FYE and the owners personally have $100,000 on 1/31, do you have $200,000 for underwriting purposes?

Answer: You do unless that’s the same $100,000 that you’re counting twice.

Company owners may loan money to the firm and later pay it back. Money gets moved around, sometimes quickly.  There should be corresponding debt entries on the financials.  But if people “forget” to show them, readers can be tricked into counting the same asset twice.  How can underwriters prevent being fooled into double counting dollars?

The solution is to always require concurrent financial statement dates.  We will always request personal financial statements as of the fiscal year-end date of the company. Personal year-ends are automatically 12/31.  But if the company has chosen a different date, that will be the personal FS date we want.

It is also typical, when reviewing unaudited (unverified by an independent third party) financial reports, to ask for proof of the cash assets – such as bank or brokerage statements.

So there you have it.  When bond underwriters count the cash, they prevent counting the same dollars twice by requiring business and personal financials as of the same date, because Counting Counts!


A special note from the author: Steve Golia

I am an Independent Broker and Surety Bond Specialist. If you wish to co-broker bond business, together we will deliver the best in bonding expertise for your clients.  I have a broad range of markets available and often can solve problems even when others have failed.

Call me now (856-304-7348) or email: Steven.Golia@gmail.com

 

Secrets of Bonding #36: When Gross Profits are Gross!

Gross Profit, Net Profit, “I can’t remember which is which.”

Here’s an easy way to remember: Gross profit is the larger number.  A Gross of something is a big amount: Picture 144 baby chicks hopping around…  In this case, Gross means “big” not “bad.”

Net profit is the smaller number. Think of when you pour something through a net or  sieve: Less comes out.

OK, so Gross Profit is found by subtracting Direct Costs from Revenues (or Sales).  These numbers always appear on a company financial statement (FS) in the “Profit & Loss” or “Statement of Income” section, near the top.

For a masonry contractor, examples of Direct Costs are bricks, mortar and the labor to install them.  Some Indirect Costs would be rent, phone expenses and office salaries.

You may have seen a Work In Process schedule which shows the financial status of open contracts. That is literally the same as the Gross Profit analysis but is specific for  each project. (Keep this in mind when you read the cool bonding tip at the end.)

Now in order to be successful, companies need to produce a Gross Profit sufficient to cover all their indirect expenses and then yield a Net Profit (which always appears at the bottom of the page.)

As surety agents, we often see companies that are suffering from lack of work. Their projects are profitable, but they don’t have enough of them.  They show a Gross Profit but cannot cover their Indirect Costs and therefore produce a Net Loss (they lose money for the year.) Maybe if they had laid off non-essential staff, closed an office or reduced other expenses, the Net Loss could have been avoided. The point here is that the contracts were performed successfully, but other expenses were not adequately managed and a Net Loss occurred.

The inspiration for this article was a FS we received that showed a negative Gross Profit. Pretty unusual.  So what did it mean?

In this case the company lost a significant amount of money on one contract.  The loss was so great that it exceeded all the gross profits earned on other projects resulting in a negative Gross Profit (a loss). Next comes the Indirect Expenses which resulted in a significant Net Loss.

When a negative Gross Profit is produced, it is almost impossible for a company to have a profitable year.  In that case, the Gross Profit is Gross – meaning bad!

Here’s an example of what you’d see on the Statement of Income:

Statement of Income

Income

          Current Earnings – $1,000,000

          Current Costs – $1,250,000

          Gross Profit (Loss) – ($250,000)

Indirect Costs

          General & Administrative Expenses – $75,000

Net Loss – ($325,000)

Cool Bonding Tip: The Gross Profit section of the P&L describes the accumulated results of past projects, similar to the WIP schedule which shows today’s projects individually, during their performance.

By comparing the expected GP % of incomplete jobs on the WIP schedule to last years P&L, you can predict if the new projects are likely to result in a NET profit for the upcoming year-end financial statement (assuming other factors, such as expenses and total revenues, are similar to the prior year.)

Business owners facing such circumstances should consider immediately cutting indirect expenses in a proportionate amount  so a fiscal year-end net profit is more likely.


A special note from the author: Steve Golia

I am an Independent Broker and Surety Bond Specialist. If you wish to co-broker bond business, together we will deliver the best in bonding expertise for your clients.  I have a broad range of markets available and often can solve problems even when others have failed.

Call me now (856-304-7348) or email: Steven.Golia@gmail.com

 

Secrets of Bonding #32: Bond Definitions – Take the Quiz!

Answers appear at the end of the article – good luck!

“You may begin.”

1. Bid Bond

a. Required by Auctioneers
b. A very small bond
c. Bond that accompanies a construction proposal

2. Surety Consent (to accompany bid)

a. Promises to provide the related Performance and Payment Bond
b. Agrees to all conditions in the related contract
c. Agrees that bond claims will be paid within 30 days

3. Bid Bond Percentage

a. Ratio of successful bid proposals
b. Portion of bid bonds used in one calendar year
c. Determines the dollar value of the bid bond

4. Performance Bond

a. Always makes reference to a written contract
b. May not be cancelled by the surety
c. Both a. and b.

5. Balance of Contract Amount

a. The point at which a contract becomes profitable
b. The unpaid portion of the contract
c. Relationship between labor and material costs

6. Payment Bond

a. Used to guarantee loans and leases
b. Guarantees payment of proper union wages
c. Guarantees suppliers of labor and material will be paid

7. Third Tier Sub

a. A class of subcontractors not covered by the Payment Bond
b. Submarines that go very, very deep
c. Low quality subcontractors

8. Subdivision Bonds

a. Similar to Submultiplication and Subaddition bonds
b. Similar to Site Bonds
c. Similar to submarines that go very, very deep

9. Penal Sum

a. Dollar value of a bond
b. Often a source of envy
c. When two penals are added together

10. Site Bonds

a. Guarantees improved vision after Lasik eye surgery
b. Guarantees the construction of public improvements
c. Guarantees a construction contract

11. Single Job Limit

a. The largest job a contractor ever performed
b. The largest job a contractor is interested in undertaking
c. The largest job a surety is willing to bond

12. Work on Hand

a. Remaining “cost to complete” for open projects
b. Underbillings
c. Costs relating to labor performed by hand

Extra Credit:

13. “Full” Indemnity

a. The indemnity of the applicant company including all of its assets
b. The indemnity of the applicant company, all owners and spouses, plus other owned/controlled companies
c. Indemnity equal to the full value of the bond amount in question

Answers:

1: Bid Bond – Bond that accompanies a construction proposal (C)

2: Surety Consent – Promises to provide the related Performance and Payment Bond (A)

3: Bid Bond Percentage – Determines the dollar value of the bid bond (C)

4: Performance Bond – Always makes reference to a written contract AND may not be cancelled by the surety (C)

5: Balance of Contract Amount – The unpaid portion of the contract (B)

6: Payment Bond – Guarantees suppliers of labor and material will be paid (C)

7: Third Tier Sub – A class of subcontractors not covered by the Payment Bond (A)

8: Subdivision Bonds – Similar to Site Bonds (B)

9: Penal Sum – Dollar value of a bond (A)

10: Site Bonds – Guarantees the construction of public improvements (B)

11: Single Job Limit – The largest job a surety is willing to bond (C)

12: Work on Hand – Remaining “cost to complete” for open projects (A)

Extra Credit: “Full” Indemnity – The indemnity of the applicant company, all owners and spouses, plus other owned/controlled companies (B)

Congratulations: You passed!


A special note from the author: Steve Golia

I am an Independent Broker and Surety Bond Specialist. If you wish to co-broker bond business, together we will deliver the best in bonding expertise for your clients.  I have a broad range of markets available and often can solve problems even when others have failed.

Call me now (856-304-7348) or email: Steven.Golia@gmail.com

 

Secrets of Bonding #26: Bond Request Forms (The Gift That Keeps Giving)

For the agent and client, there is plenty of paper to handle on contract surety bonds.  So just when you get through the questionnaire, business plan, resumes, references, WIPs, and financials there is STILL ONE MORE DOCUMENT THAT WE NEED!

Yes, it is true.  Bond Request Forms are the gift that keeps giving because you get the opportunity to do one as each bond comes up.  So, considering these forms are not going away, let’s get comfortable with them.

Why Needed

The Bond Request Form is a summary of key factors concerning the specific contract and bond in question. The form is used for both Bids and “Final” bonds (Performance & Payment). It covers basics such as the name of the contractor and obligee, description of the work and the specific bonding requirements.

The form is used for underwriting and administrative purposes.  The underwriters review the details and may literally sign their approval on the form.  The admin staff will type the bond based on the Request Form – so completeness and accuracy are crucial.

Let’s break it down and go over some key areas:

  • The Principal is the contractor and the Obligee is the party paying for the work.  Sometimes the word “Owner” is used interchangeably with Obligee. If you see Owner on the Bond Request, it is not asking for the name of the owner of the construction company; it means “Obligee.”
  • The description of the work should read as stated on the related contract or bid invitation.  If you are bonding a roofing contract, the description should not be “4th Avenue Elementary School.” It should say “…roofing…”  On a final bond such errors are embarrassing. In a bid situation an incorrect job description could result in a bid protest (by the second bidder) and loss of an award.
  • For Bid Bonds, show the estimated contract price (ECP), not the actual bid amount.  This is to protect the bid confidentiality.  Sometimes we bond more than one contractor on the same bid.
  • Always submit a sufficiently high ECP to allow room for a last minute bid increase. (See Secret # 8.)
  • Show the actual bid date, not the day before for “safety.”
  • Bid results are important to show if they are available.  Typically they are on public work.
  • When indicating the final bond requirements, do not indicate “100% P&P” unless the spec actually calls for this.  Some projects require a Performance Bond but no Payment.  It would be important to not automatically issue a Payment Bond, since they are the most frequent source of surety claims. The Principal and Surety should never voluntarily assume this risk.
  • Work On Hand: The current WOH figure is comprised of the “estimated cost to complete” of all open work – excluding the project in question.
  • Be sure to fully complete the form, include required attachments and sign if necessary.
  • Points of interest:
    • Sureties are usually reluctant to provide a 125% P&P Bond.
    • If the bond is for less than 100% of the contract amount, there may be no reduction in the bond cost.

Bond Request Forms: We love them and you should too!  Every one is a chance to serve your client and  make money.