bond forms

Secrets of Bonding #129: What It Takes To Get a $1 Million Bond

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

Here is a common fallacy held by observers of the surety bonding industry: whellbarrow money

How much cash do you need to get a $1 million bond?  The answer is NOT $1,000,000. Surprisingly, you only need a fraction of the $1 million, but you do need other elements as well.  Let’s dive in!

Our readers may be familiar with the 3 Cs of Surety Bond Underwriting: Coercion, Corruption, Cowardice.  Actually they are Character, Capacity and Capital. These describe areas of analysis that are important to the bond decision-makers.  Cash falls under the Capital heading.  Other factors are also important.

  • Character includes the applicant’s credit rating and operating history. Bill paying habits are reviewed along with references from suppliers and lenders. Character evaluates if the applicant is likely to honor their obligations under the contract and bond.
  • Capacity cover the skills of key people, company experience overall, plant, equipment and other factors.
  • Capital includes all financial resources, including Cash.

The Magic Number

Stacks of US currency

There is no magic number. When underwriters review the company financial statement they do look at the cash position.  In addition, they evaluate the Working Capital, which is the sum of cash, accounts receivable, inventory, and other items, minus Current Liabilities.  Working Capital consists of elements that will become cash during the current fiscal period (the accounting year).  For example, a dollar of “good” receivables is the same as cash to credit analysts.  So to this extent, less pure cash is needed.

Financing New Projects

One of the reasons contractors need Working Capital (WC) is to finance the start of new projects.  They must mobilize the job site, pay laborers and purchase materials – all out of their pocket initially.  As the project proceeds, it starts to fund itself. 

For the $1 million contract with the $1 million bond, would it take $1 million to finance the start?  No, it would just be a percentage of the $1 million.

The Two-Part Answer

Many bundle of US 100 dollars bank notes

This brings us to the answer. Cash is one component of Working Capital, and underwriters expect WC to equal about 10% of the bonded exposure. This could mean that the $1 million bond requires less than $100,000 cash when combined with other working capital components. However, cash alone doesn’t get bonds approved.

All of the 3 Cs are equally important. Cash is not the sole basis of the decision.  A cash rich company with bad credit or weak prior experience will still be declined.  Cash cannot overcome these deficiencies.

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision and Contract Surety Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Secrets of Bonding # 128: The Unexpected Cause of Contractor Failure

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

Why do construction companies go out of business? What reasons have you heard for companies shutting down?

  • “The economy is terrible.”
  • “There’s no work.”
  • “Too many bidders. You can’t get a decent profit and I won’t work for nothing.”

All these explanations amount to the same thing: A lack of projects resulting in low revenues, low profits and no cash flow. The situation seems obvious. When there isn’t enough work available, many contractors are forced to shut down. So is this THE BIG cause of contractor failure? Surprisingly,  no!

closed1Many construction companies fail because they have too much work. Is it possible that too much of a good thing spells disaster? We’ve all heard the stories about lottery winners who say the money ruined their lives. Suddenly they’re rich, but they weren’t ready for it. The very thing they wanted more of, turned out to be their undoing.

For construction companies, the mission is to acquire and perform profitable contracts. A tremendous amount of effort is spent in the pursuit of new work. So what can go wrong to make the volume a disadvantage, causing the demise of the enterprise?

Capital

One answer is the Lack of Sufficient Capital – both the money kind and people. As companies grow, more liquid resources (cash) are needed to finance the start of new projects and solve problems. Human resources are needed such as field supervision and back office support. Companies can fail when the office staff is unable to keep pace with the paperwork. Billings don’t go out on time, receivables are not collected, cash flow is choked off.  It is management’s responsibility to anticipate these needs and prevent the deficiencies.

Field production can suffer when the supervisory staff is inadequate. This leads to reduced gross and net profits, less available cash, the beginning of a downward spiral.

Managmentclosed2

Consider the Corner Office: Poor leadership, lack of business knowledge and inadequate financial management can be catastrophic. In addition to setting the tone and establishing the company mission, the bosses must have the technical knowledge a larger company requires.  They must be sophisticated financial managers to control resources and garner needed support from financial institutions. The successful manager of a mid-sized business is not necessarily equipped to run a large company.

New Geographic Territory

Management’s pursuit of growth can lead the company into new geographic markets (the grass is always greener.)  This may present unexpected challenges and obstacles including local union resistance, unfamiliar underground conditions, logistics problems, reduced labor productivity rates, adverse weather conditions, etc.  On the east coast (I’m a New Yorker), bond underwriters have long shared stories of NY contractors who ventured to Florida and got their butts kicked…  They say “Florida beaches are littered with the bones of NY contractors.”

Adding New Type Work

Some companies have strayed from their normal type of work in the pursuit of added revenues. They get in trouble trying to enter and compete as newcomers to the field. The company may lack the expertise (estimating, field management) for the new type work. How can you be successful in a competitive bidding environment when going against companies already entrenched in the market?  Do you take work cheap and hope for the best? “We’re losing money but we’ll make it up on volume.”

Our point of view is based on surety bond underwriting. All these issues are well known to bonding companies. When their construction clients want dramatic growth, new types of contracts or transition to a new geographic market, that’s a red flag. They come back with the hard question, “Tell us: Why this is a good idea?”closed3

Contractors may feel that sureties hold them back. Maybe they are too conservative. Do they really want contractors to grow? They think they know better than the contractor?

Actually, the surety and the contractor succeed or fail together. Having seen good clients encounter unexpected problems, underwriters know firsthand how quickly things can unravel.

Writing more bonds and bigger bonds is how bonding companies grow. Certainly, construction companies must grow to survive, and being bigger can be better.  But uncontrolled growth is the major cause of contractor failure that sureties, and contractors, must avoid.

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision and Contract Surety Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Not available in all states including Idaho.

Secrets of Bonding #127: “The Call”

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

A couple of times every week we talk to a new contractor who wants to get their bond account set up for the first time.  Here’s how it always goes:

  • Contractor: We want to go after bonded projects but we’ve never had bonds before.  What’s involved?
  • Surety: OK Hi! Who am I speaking to?
  • Contractor: I’m Humphrey.
  • Surety: All right Humphrey, can we start by asking you a few questions?  What is the size and nature of the work you intend to pursue?TelefMan-07

Scenario #1 (Pursuing contracts up to $500,000)

  • Contractor: We have performed residential and light commercial work.  We want to go after general construction contracts up to about $250,000.
  • Surety: Great! Tell me the ownership and structure of your company.
  • Contractor: The company is an LLC owned by me and my partner, Bogart.
  • Surety: Are you married?
  • Contractor: Yes, but not to each other.
  • Surety: We have a very easy program that may be a perfect starting point for you.  To be eligible, the owners and spouses must have good personal credit reports. Are the reports favorable?
  • Contractor: Yes.
  • Surety: There are some other criteria.  For example, the program cannot be used for long-term contracts or difficult / unique construction – needs to be plain vanilla.  The good thing is that no financial statements or other documentation is required, only a simple, short app. If this program fits your needs, you’ll never find anything easier or faster! Give me your email address and we’ll send you the FASTAPP.  We can probably get you pre-qualified within 24 hours!

Scenario #2 (Pursuing contracts in excess of $500,000, or for applicants with low credit scores)

  • Surety: We find that most contractors are able to qualify for bonding if their account is developed properly.  That’s where our expertise (since 1979!)  comes into play.
  • Contractor: What info will be needed?
  • Surety:  Getting approved for bonding is like applying for a bank loan. The same kind of financial and background info is needed.  Your relationship with the surety is similar to banking and you promise to protect the surety from loss, just like signing a promissory note with a lender.  That’s why surety bonds are not insurance policies.
  • Contractor: OK what’s the next step and how much does it cost?
  • Surety: We don’t charge for setting up your account!  We’ll send you an email with a list of items that are needed initially.  Gather as much as you can and send over so we can get started.  The process normally takes a week or two.  You don’t pay until you win a contract and need a performance bond.

Conclusion

Have we oversimplified the process? Actually, no.  It is easier than people assume to get their bond account arranged – when you know the ropes.  That’s our niche.  We don’t pretend to be good at everything, but we are experts at this!

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision and Contract Surety Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Secrets of Bonding #126: Surety Bonds in the Bizarro World

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

There have been 24 movies about Superman, but I loved the original TV series starring George Reeves (the real Superman). Even before that, there were Superman comic books published by DC Comics.

BizarroThe character, “Bizarro #1,” first appeared in 1958 – a mirror image of Superman but from a world where everything was opposite from that of humans. That was over 50 years ago, but strangely, there is a little piece of Bizarro World that still survives today. It is alive in our surety rate system. See if you agree…

Example #1

A contractor won a $1 million contract. The specification calls for a 50% performance bond: $500,000. The surety’s maximum exposure is $500,000.

Bizarro Fact: The bond rate is based on the contract amount, the full $1 million!

Example #2

Sureties often issue a Performance and Payment Bond in a single combined instrument that states the bond amount once (the penal sum). However, if required, they will issue two separate instruments, one Performance and the other Payment, each with it’s own penal sum (double the amount in the combined bond form.)

Bizarro Fact: When required to issue this double bond amount, the bond premium remains the same as for the combined bond form!

Example #3

The contractor has already started the project. Now it has been verified that 50% of the work is completed and accepted by the project owner. It is confirmed that all related bills have been paid. It is apparent that 50% of the exposure has been eliminated.

Bizarro Fact: The bond costs the same as if it had been issued at the start of the work. There is no reduction or recognition for the portion of the exposure that has been eliminated.

Example #4

The contractor has negotiated a $1 million contract. Now the project owner has indicated that a P&P bond must be provided. The surety states that the cost of the bond will be 2% of the contract amount. Is the cost 2% of $1 million ($20,000)?

Bizarro Fact: No! The correct calculation is 2% of $1,020,000 or $20,400. The bond premium is calculated on itself, even though it cannot be classified as part of the contract exposure.

There you have it: The upside-down world we actually live in. Naturally there are justifications for all the procedures sureties use, but still, they are Bizarro!

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision and Contract Surety Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Secrets of Bonding #124: Underwriting Challenge – What’s Wrong With This Picture?

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

Years ago when I was just a cub reporter for the Daily Planet, I mean surety underwriter, I ran into a strange situation that was recently repeated.  In this article we will present the scenario and ask you to use your underwriting judgement. The question is… “What’s wrong with this picture?”

Scenario #1

Originally this came up on a Lost Instrument Bond.  These are needed when requesting the issuance of a duplicate cashier’s check, security, or other financial instruments.  The applicant claimed a negotiable instrument (anyone holding it could potentially cash it in) had been inadvertently destroyed. He was a young adult in his 20’s who had inherited the asset.  His financial statement showed little other than the asset in question, which was a problem because the underwriters do not want to feel that the person has a reason to fraudulently convert the “lost” asset and it’s replacement.

We wrote back and expressed the underwriting concern, that the applicants financial position was inadequate.  In response we received a novel proposal: When the replacement instrument is issued, it will be conveyed directly to the surety who can hold it as full collateral against their exposure, until the bond is released (years!) “There will be no risk to the surety.”  Sounds pretty good? 

In my infantile underwriting mind I thought this sounded intriguing, but it also made me uncomfortable. Why had I never heard of doing this before? Maybe I was on the verge of creating an entirely new underwriting procedure.  Will they name it after me?

What was wrong with this picture?

Scenario #2Whats_wrong

In the more recent situation, the surety was being asked to support a multi-million dollar purchase transaction.  The applicant (a person) was a foreigner, an accomplished business person, who was not familiar with surety underwriting requirements.  They were not accustomed to providing personal financial info or involving the spouse in business obligations.

As a way of supporting the transaction, and maybe dodging the indemnity requirements, it was suggested that title to the purchased property would be conveyed directly to the surety (sound familiar?).  After the financial transaction (which was the subject of the surety guarantee) is completed, the surety will be released, the title will be transferred to the buyer, and “the surety will never be in a position of risk.” Boom!  Let’s do it!

What’s wrong with this picture?

The Answer

Here is good advice.  If your underwriting brain feels like something is wrong, it probably is!  The problem with both these scenarios is the timing.  

Bonding companies ALWAYS secure their position before assuming an obligation. It is incumbent on the underwriters to protect their company assets and its owners by doing so. 

Think about bank lending practices, which are not unlike surety underwriting.  Would a bank make a building loan relying solely on the future value of the project? No, they require being secured with sufficient assets in advance such as the company and personal net worth of the applicant and possibly other collateral.

Financial obligations always require that the credit grantor be secured in advance. Prudent decision making requires this.

So the next time you see something that doesn’t feel right, trust your gut.

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision and Contract Surety Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Secrets of Bonding #120: About the “T-List”

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

If:  

  1. You are interested or active in Surety Bonds (bid, performance & payment, etc.), and…
  2. You think the T-list is who you are following on Twitter, then… 
  3. You need to read this article!

What is the T-List?           (Click for mood music) 

For bond producers / agents, bonding companies and bonded contractors, Circular 570 (the official document title) is the list of sureties accepted on federal projects produced annually by the federal Treasury department. It is easily found online.

What does the list provide?

In addition to the name and address of the approved bonding companies, it states the maximum acceptable amount for any one bond (based on the surety’s financial position), and where the surety has indicated it is licensed.

Is a T-listed performance and payment bond required on all federal projects?T

Generally yes, although small and emergency contracts, and some service and commodity contracts are not bonded. The feds will also accept alternatives to a bond such a “cash” deposit held by the government, and tripartite agreements (which is a form of funds administration.)

Federal contracting officers also may have the latitude to accept a non T-listed surety on larger contracts if they deem it is in the best interests of the government.

Is a T-Listed bid bond required on federal projects?

Yes, when bid security is stipulated and a bond is the chosen method of compliance.  For example, a form of cash may be allowed at this stage, then a bond could be used for performance and payment.  Another twist, some federal projects call for a “bondability letter” instead of bid security.  This indicates the sureties interest in supporting the contract, but does not include a penal sum or any form of financial penalty.

Is the T-list required on state or municipal contracts?

Circular 570 is intended to be a federal requirement, although state and municipal owners may choose to stipulate it as a means of pre-qualifying the bonding companies.

t-400

When a surety is on the list, does the federal government “back” the bonding company for the benefit of other parties?

No, it is merely the government’s internal opinion regarding the condition of the surety.  The feds make no guarantee to 3rd parties regarding the viability of the surety, or the correctness of including them on the list

Can a surety fail while enjoying “approved” status on the list?

Yup.

Are there any strong bonding companies that are not on the list?

Yes, many!  Only sureties that decide they want to be on the list are reviewed by the federal analysts.  They must submit their info and go through the process.  Some bonding companies are not intending to bond federal contracts, or may be ineligible for some reason.  They could be among the strongest sureties in the country, but would not be on the list.

Must subcontractors on federal projects use T-listed sureties?

It is not automatically required because these are considered private contracts between the general / prime contractor and the subcontractor. However, see next question…

What about private owners?

THE A-TEAM -- Pictured: Mr. T as Sgt. Bosco "B.A." Baracus -- Photo by: Herb Ball/NBCU Photo Bank
THE A-TEAM — Pictured: Mr. T

On private contracts, such as ALL subcontracts and projects with an owner that is not a public entity, the bonding requirements are at the owner’s discretion – including whether or not they even want a bond. They may demand the use of their own special bond form (some general contractors develop a subcontract bond form extra beneficial to them) and may stipulate a T-list requirement.

In some cases, the GC’s surety makes the subcontract bonding requirements.

Conclusion

In essence, always assume a Circular 570 surety is required on federal contracts.  The bond amount cannot exceed the limit stated on the list, and the bond should state the surety’s address as indicated on 570.

When other public entities require the T-list, such as state or municipal owners, it is mandatory because there is normally no flexibility in their specifications. However private owners set their own rules so subcontractors and GCs working for private owners may have the opportunity to negotiate away the T-list requirement if their viable surety is not on the federal list.

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision and Contract Surety Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Secrets of Bonding #113: Your 1st Bond – Choose Door #1 or 2?

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

Every week we get inquiries regarding clients who need their very first bond.  This is a great question and one we love to answer.  It is particularly gratifying to give a new client their first bond – of many!

There are different paths forward depending on the circumstances.  Each door has different aspects.  Let’s go over them.

Door Number 1:open_door3

Use this door for contracts (federal and all others) up to about $500,000.  This is the fastest / easiest program with the first bond approval coming over in about 1 day!  Only a one page application is needed – no financial statements.  The program is predicated on the work being simple and normal for the contractor, and personal credit reports of owners and spouses must be acceptable.

This door is perfect for companies that are not pursuing contracts in excess of $500,000.  Other applicants can also use it as a quick way to start while completing the application process for higher amounts.

As with all the doors, there is no charge to get pre-qualified for bonding!

Door Number 2:

This is for contracts from $500,000-7500,000.  Similar to Door Number 1, but now add “in house” company financial statements and/or tax returns. A longer questionnaire is needed, and supporting documents such as resumes, references and personal financial statements may be required.

Door Number 3:open_door1

For contracts in the $750,000-1,000,000 range, plan on a CPA prepared Compilation financial statement.  This is the lowest level (least expensive) CPA financial report.  It is needed once per year.

Door Number 4:

Contracts over $1-2 million may require an annual CPA Review financial statement.

Number 5 (fancy!):open_door5

For large contracts in excess of $10 million, a CPA Audit may be required by the underwriters.

It makes sense that as the obligations become larger, higher quality, more complete information is needed.

Is there some flexibility?  Sure!  It may not seem so, but underwriters are motivated to be flexible and find ways to write the business.  After all, no bonds = no revenues.  They must find ways to say yes.

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision, Bid and Performance Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, AVP: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Secrets of Bonding #112: Net Worth – Feed the Pig!

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

When it comes to Bid and Performance Bonds, you may have heard that Working Capital is a deciding factor.  If the calculated amount on the applicant’s financial statement is insufficient, the surety underwriter will decline the bond.pig3

So what is Net Worth (NW) and how important is it for bonding purposes?  Let’s start with a brief description of what this is and where you find it in the financial reporting.  Funny thing about net worth: It is a measure of the company’s financial strength, but it is listed among the company’s debts! Hmmm…

Where Do You Find It?

NW aka “Stockholders Equity” is listed on the company Balance Sheet, which is divided into assets and liabilities (debts). 

The assets include cash in the bank, accounts receivable, buildings, equipment, etc.  The liabilities are accounts payable, bank and other loans, other debts, and (in a corporation) the Stockholders Equity. The NW or Stockholders Equity section appears at the bottom of the Liabilities column, below “Total Liabilities.”

What Is It?

Stockholders Equity shows the funds put in (loaned to) the firm by the stockholders such as Capital Stock, plus the portion of all past profits allowed to accumulate in the company (called Retained Earnings). These comprise the corporation’s NW.

Why is it a liability?  NW is a liability because it is owned by the stockholders, not the corporation itself. If the company shuts down and is liquidated, the NW goes the stockholders and the corp reverts to its original financial position: $0.

pig2Think of NW as a piggy bank that holds the company’s long-term, ultimate financial reserves.

Now let’s discuss what this has to do with surety bonds. Bond underwriters always evaluate the Working Capital amount.  And many place equal importance on the NW.  While it is true that a company can show good Working Capital but have no NW, is a lack of NW really a concern?  You may assume it is difficult to get a bank loan with no NW, the same applies to bonds. 

Surety underwriters are concerned about a company’s staying power if they don’t have financial reserves to help survive tough times.  When companies fail, there are bond claims – exactly what the underwriters don’t want!

Analysts will wonder “Why is there no NW in this company?” especially if it is not a new entity.  Has there been a lack of profitability, a failure of management, and therefore no profits to accumulate?

Our “Secrets” articles are usually inspired by the file activity we enjoy each week with our valued agents. Such was the case this week.  Here is the actual info from a financial statement that was the seed for this article:  “(  )” indicates a negative number.

STATEMENT OF EQUITY, September 30, 2015

Balance at January 1, 2015               $            0
Plus: Member’s contributions               33,616
Less: Net loss                                          (50,597)
Less Member’s distributions              (131,060)
Balance at September 30, 2015       $(148,041)

This report is describing the changes in one part of the NW.  They started with nothing, put in $33 thousand, lost $50 thousand this year, and on top of that, took out everything they put in and more!  What are they thinking?!

Q. If you are the bond underwriter contemplating the likelihood of this company’s survival, what might you conclude?

  1. Company management is weak?
  2. Their ability to continue may be doubtful?
  3. Instead of bolstering the company with additional funds, the owners are stripping it of assets – maybe with the intention of declaring bankruptcy?

A. All of the above!

Our conclusion is that Net Worth IS important. In bonding, the company is the applicant.  Its financial position indicates if management has achieved profitability and accumulated a war chest of funds to provide a strong foundation.  Without it, future credit may be unavailable, and the company may falter when facing difficulties.

NW is one of the critical factors underwriters, and all credit analysts, review.  It should be nurtured, protected and preserved.

pig1

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site, Subdivision, Bid and Performance Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one.

Steve Golia, Marketing Mgr.: 856-304-7348

First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Secrets of Bonding #77: Fire, the Wheel, Surety Bond Rates

Steve GoliaLeave a comment

These were among caveman’s greatest inventions.  But unfortunately, bond rates have changed little since the Paleolithic Era!

That may be a slight exaggeration, but it is true that bond rates and rating methods are not revised often.  Here are some of the peculiarities worth knowing, primarily in the area of contract surety:

  1. All sureties are entitled to charge for bid bonds, but most do not.
  2. They may charge for performance bonds in advance, but many wait 45 days for payment even though the instrument is uncancellable.
  3. A performance and payment bond costs the same as just a performance bond.
  4. A 100% performance and 100% payment bond costs the same as a 100% performance and 50% payment bond.
  5. A maintenance bond may be cheaper if the same surety preceded it with a performance bond.
  6. A 20% performance bond may cost the same as a 100% bond even though the surety has 1/5th as much exposure.
  7. In cases where a bid bond or surety consent letter is required, but then the work is awarded without requiring a final bond, the surety is entitled to make a charge for the unissued performance bond.

Now here is my favorite crazy bond rule.

Situation: You have a $1,000,000 private contract on which a P&P bond is optional.  The project owner asks the contractor to price an “alternate” to include a bond.

Let’s say the bond rate is 2% of the contract amount. So what is the bond price?

  1. $20,000
  2. $40,000
  3. $20,400
  4. $40,200

I know you love #1. It just looks so right.

But alas, that is not the answer, which is why this wins the wacky award!

#3. is the correct answer. The reason is that the bond fee is actually calculated on itself.  When determining the bond fee, it is not correct to remove the bond cost from the contract amount.  Like the cost of insurance and all costs related to the project, the bond cost is included in the contract amount.

Therefore, the correct basis for the calculation is $1,020,000 x 2% = $20,400.

Q. So what about the additional $400? Should the calculation actually be $1,020,400 x 2%? (Then, wouldn’t you have to recalculate it again, and again, and again…)

Q. And who pays the extra $400? It’s not in the $1,020,000 contract amount.

A. Beats me. You better ask that Neanderthal in the corner office!

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site and Subdivision Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one, Bid and Performance bonds, too.

Steve Golia: 856-304-7348
First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Don’t miss our next exciting surety article: “Follow” this blog in the top right hand corner.

Secrets of Bonding #75: How come HE can get a bond?!

Steve Golia1 Comment

We have been dedicated exclusively to providing bonds for contractors for 40 years, and we’ve heard this question at least 40 times!

It’s frustrating for contractors.  Everyone knows surety bonds are hard to get, but it is really maddening when your less capable competitors are bidding public work and you can’t get across the goal line.  What is the missing ingredient?  Can we name the secret that answers this question?

The process of qualifying for bid and performance bonds is based on people and paper.  The contractor is interviewed and evaluated.  That’s the people part.  A file is gathered and the paperwork is reviewed.  What can cause a perfectly capable contractor to not qualify for bonding?  The answer may be the paperwork.

Secret #5 was “The Three C’s of Bonding – Plus One!”  It touched on this important point. In our experience, the most common area where capable and bond worthy contractors fall down is in the creation of their file.

The people part of the process is obviously important.  If the underwriter is uncomfortable with the applicant, guess what: No bonds.  The paperwork doesn’t matter if the human element fails.

However, it is equally true that the paperwork must achieve its goal.  And what is that goal?  It is CREDIBILITY.  The difference between two equally capable contractors, where only one is bonded, may be the failure to present a convincing file.

When reviewing a new account, bond underwriters know what is normal and believable.  Contractors who fail to meet these expectations will be rejected. Think of an extreme example: If you were evaluating the file, would you be more likely to believe an applicant’s self-serving comment that they have $100,000 in the bank, or an independent CPA firm that issued a report confirming they verified such an asset? HOW the info is presented can make all the difference.

It’s just that simple.  The purpose of the file is to establish the contractor’s CREDIBILITY for all who read it, including those who will not actually meet the applicant.  For them, their decision-making is based solely on the credibility and content of the file.

What are some of the most common paperwork deficiencies that derail contractors?

  1. Lack of credible financial information. They don’t have a year-end financial statement.  Maybe the accounting method is unacceptable or they should have a CPA prepared report but don’t. Sometimes the financial reports contain arithmetic errors and have sections missing.
  2. Bad advice. Actions taken by management can make it harder to obtain bonds. Borrowing money, investing and even the choice of accounting methods can have an impact.
  3. Incomplete files. Many contractors start but fail to complete.  Their energy is focused on “making money,” so they never take the time to complete their bond submission.

We don’t want to over simplify the process.  Each company is different, and there are nuances to developing each applicant to assure their strengths and capabilities are showcased.  We are not intending to explain HOW to establish credibility.  Out point is that unless it is established, there are no bonds – regardless of how capable the contractor may be!

FIA Surety is a NJ based bonding company (carrier) that has specialized in Site and Subdivision Bonds since 1979 – we’re good at it!  Call us with your next one, Bid and Performance bonds, too.

Steve Golia: 856-304-7348
First Indemnity of America Ins. Co.

Don’t miss our next exciting surety article: “Follow” this blog in the top right hand corner.